美国代写被抓:知识产权相关法律

23 5月 美国代写被抓:知识产权相关法律

美国代写被抓:知识产权相关法律

斯泰西来找你,寻求你的意见,关于她的知识产权的性质,从上述事实,包括任何她可能对萨曼莎的电影,以及如何最好地保护他们在法律上。建议她。请评论如果她早些时候采取措施保护自己的权利,这些权利可能会有什么不同。

确认相关事实和问题。双方在什么问题上有分歧?

在这个过程中所讨论的事实和问题与斯泰西的案例相符合。在这篇文章中,StaCeYY的一个竞争对手抄袭了她的商标和她设计的餐桌的设计。这影响了公司的业务,因为他们有自己的独特的设计(壳牌,1987)。餐桌设计的复制是从网上的宣传册和斯黛西的朋友斯曼萨制作的视频中完成的,并被放到了斯黛西的facebook页面上。迈克尔是家具制造公司,复制了斯泰西的东西。但他不同意事实和问题,他复制了斯泰西的标志。对于这个问题,StaCeYY正在寻求专业人士的帮助,他们可以指导她使用知识产权和法律(Selvadurai, 2008)。

确定解决问题的相关法律(判例法或立法)?

可以用来保护知识产权商标的相关法律是《1995年商标法》。这项法律将有助于斯泰西保护家具制造公司的商标。然而,首先,他们需要申请将商标作为知识产权。她还没有申请知识产权法。因此,她无法阻止任何人利用她在市场上用于营销目的的那种交易。另一方面,餐桌的设计也是如此。由于斯泰西比迈可尔大7岁,因此可以从知识产权中获得保护。她可以申请商标著作权,也可以销售类似设计的餐桌。

在制造产品的知识产权设计中,任何制造商都没有权利指责其他公司使用类似的设计,除非或者直到他们没有根据知识产权向澳大利亚政府注册(Shell, 1987)。

美国代写被抓:知识产权相关法律

StaCeYY has come to you seeking your advice as to the nature of her intellectual property rights arising from the facts above, including any she may have in respect of Samantha’s films, and how best to protect them at law. Advise her. Comment on how those rights may be different if she had taken steps to protect her rights earlier.

Identify the relevant facts and issues, i.e, what are the parties disagreeing about?

Facts and the issues that are discussed in the process were appropriate with the StaCeYY’s case. In it, one of the rivals of StaCeYY has copied her logo as well as the design of the dining table which she has designed. This affects the business of the company as they have their uniqueness in the designs (Shell, 1987). The copying of the dining table design was done from the online brochure and also a video which was made by Smantha, a friend of staceyy and was put it on the facebook page of StaCeYY. MiChaeL was the furniture manufacturing company which has copied the stuff of StaCeYY. But he was disagreeing about the facts and issues that he had copied the logo of StaCeYY. For this issue, StaCeYY is seeking help from the professional who can guide her to use the intellectual property rights and laws (Selvadurai, 2008).

Identify the relevant law (case law or legislation) to resolving the problem?

The relevant law which can be used for the protection of intellectual property trade mark is Trade Mark Act 1995. This law will help StaCeYY to protect the trademark of the furniture manufacturing company. However, firstly, they need to apply for making the trademark as the intellectual property. She has not applied for the intellectual property law. Therefore, she can’t stop anyone from using the kind of trade which she used for her marketing purpose in the market. On the other hand, the same is with the designs of the dining table. The protection can be taken from the intellectual property rights because StaCeYY is 7 years older than that of the MiCheaL. She can apply against the trademark copyrights and also the marketing of the dining table of similar designs.

In the intellectual designs of the manufacturing goods, no manufacturers have the right that they can blame other companies to use similar kind of designs unless or until they would not register with the Australian government under the intellectual property rights(Shell, 1987).