本文的主要内容是普通法的职责，《2001公司法》(Cth)要求公司董事以符合第180条尽职调查要求的方式行事。这一职责在决策过程中始终适用。在普通法责任下，第一项责任是代表公司利益时诚实守信的责任。这里有一个主观的测试，以便理解诚信的遵从性意味着什么。在特定的情况下，董事们不应该在自己的头脑中失败。本篇美国市场营销论文代写文章由美国论文人EducationRen教育网整理，供大家参考阅读。
The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) expects the company director to act in a way that respects the due diligence requirements of section 180. This duty is applicable at all times in the decision-making process. Under common law duties, the first is the duty of acting in honest and good faith when representing the company interests. Here there is a subjective test in order to understand what compliance in good faith means. Given a certain situation the directors should not fail in their own minds.
If they do so then they are considered to have breached the faith. Company interests and own interests should not be mixed and the director at all points should ensure that company interests are put forward first. An objective standard of whose interests are given importance as perceived by a rational bystander would be considered when assessing a breach test. In considering the interests of company, the complete set of shareholders as a collective group and their interests should have been considered according to Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Pty Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 285 and Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1.
Under common loan duties, the director should in no way act in an improper way. Acting in an improper way would mean that the director was trying to coerce action that was favourable for him but for not others. The action should further the interests of the company. Where the director does not act in the prescribed way then they are acting improperly. This is a breach of the common law and the statutory sections that require director to behave properly.
Under common law duties, the director was to exercise duties of care and diligence as well. They cannot be ignorant of company’s affairs and when necessary they should question or answer for some of their actions. This is observed in the Statewide Tobacco Services Ltd v Morley (1990) 2 ACSR 405. Where such an issue of lack of due diligence is brought to the directors notice then they should attempt to correct it in an informed way. When they don’t take corrective action even after understanding the situation, they have breached their duty. Finally, the duty to avoid conflicts of interest is one of their main duties. The director must act in such a way that they fulfil their fiduciary duties towards the company. In doing so may not have any form of direct or indirect conflict of interest.
美国论文人EducationRen教育网具有一家专业的美国论文代写机构所要必备的条件。无论是原创性，创新性还是合理性对于一篇论文来说都是非常重要的。能够获得学生的首肯，成为最值得学生信赖的美国论文代写机构是我们美国论文人论文代写网始终以来的目标，我们也在不断地努力完善，创新，期望可以为留学生们提供最好的美国代写服务。
