论文代写：两篇文章的比较
本文的主要目的是对两篇文章的比较，“什么是战略”和“公司的核心竞争力”，以确定文章之间的相似性和差异性。波特（1996）有相当大的竞争力（1996）把他的文章放在战略上，并提到，仅仅是操作的有效性不是战略，虽然这两个是必要的竞争性能，但他们以不同的方式工作。与此相反，Prahalad和Hamel（1990）在他们的文章中已经说明了一个组织的核心竞争力，让它来驱动从市场竞争和表现的像个领袖。这是相当大的竞争力来源于能够产生不仅以较低的成本，但也比竞争对手更迅速。
对于领导，文章的意思是，应该有取舍的战略，使他们能够有效地竞争。领导者应考虑到一些竞争性的活动是不相容的，因此，在一个地区的利益可以达到只在其他地区的支付。此外，文章是显着的领导，因为它已被提及，员工需要指导，以加强战略地位，而不是扩大或妥协，这可以提供的领导人。
论文代写：两篇文章的比较
The current essay is aimed at the presenting the comparison of two articles, “What is Strategy” and “The Core Competence of the Corporation” in order to identify the similarities and differences between the articles. It is considerable that Porter (1996) has Porter (1996) has focussed his article on strategy and has mentioned that merely operational effectiveness is not strategy; though both are essential for competitive performance but they work in different manner. In contrast, Prahalad and Hamel (1990) in their article have illuminated that core competencies of an organization allow it to drive out competition from the market and perform like a leader. It is considerable that competitiveness originates from the capability to generate not only at a lower cost, but also more quickly than competitors.
For leadership, the articles means that there should be trade-offs in strategy so that they allow companies to compete effectively. Leaders should take into consideration that some competitive activities are incompatible, and thus, benefits in one area can be attained only at the disbursement of other area. Moreover, the articles are significant for leadership because it has been mentioned that employees require guidance in order to intensify a strategic position instead of broadening it or compromising and this can be provided by leaders only.
