英国 代写:企业合并

04 6月 英国 代写:企业合并

英国 代写:企业合并

由于Yates是一个较大的公司,Porte是一个小公司,Porte与Yates合并,在这个案例中Yates的CEO将会继续,Porte的CEO将会在新的合并公司中加入高级管理团队。这将降低成本,因为之前是由两名首席执行官支付的,而现在只有高级管理人员才能得到报酬。这将减少合并后的费用。波尔特的首席执行官被免职是因为他缺乏经验,而合并的决定是由耶茨的首席执行官和董事会做出的。由于Porte的CEO已经转到了高级管理层,这就是为什么高级管理层的成本增加了。波尔特行政长官因为员工属于波尔特行政长官而离职。

英国 代写:企业合并

因为Porte的CEO已经转移到高级管理职位,Porte的CEO不需要任何管理人员。行政人员的费用因此而减少。由于两家公司都需要大量的技术人员,因此在合并后,技术人员的工资将相当于Yates有限公司的工资。Porte曾经是Porte租赁的,但合并后的租金将为零。因为Yates是在自己的建筑中运行,所以支付租金是零但是建筑的折旧成本和之前一样。办公费用会减少,因为合并后新员工只会使用现有设施。在所有这些成本中,技术团队成本是非常合理的。与新的经验丰富的技术团队一样,合并后公司的生产率也会提高。合并后的大部分成本与耶茨有关,因为它并没有增加总成本。

英国 代写:企业合并

since Yates is a bigger company and Porte is a small company where Porte is mergered to Yates, in this case Yates CEO will continue and Porte CEO will move to senior management team in the new merger company. This will reduce the costs as it was earlier paid to two CEOs and now only senior management will be paid. This will allow reducing the expenses after merger. Porte CEO is removed because he has less experience and the merger decision is taken by Yates CEO & Boards. Since the CEO of Porte has moved to senior management, this is the reason why the cost of senior management has been increased. Porte administrator has left because the staff belong to Porte CEO.

英国 代写:企业合并
Because Porte CEO has moved to senior management role, Porte CEO would not need further any administrator staff. The cost hence decreased in the case of the administrative staff. Since both companies need technical staff heavily, hence after merger, the salary of technical staff will be equivalent to the that of the Yates Ltd. Porte used to pay rent amount as Porte has rented place, but after merger the rent will be zero. Because Yates was running in its own building, so paying rent was zero but there was depreciation cost of building which will be the same as earlier. Office expenses will decrease because after the merger the new employee will only use the existing facility. In all these costs, technical team costs make sense a lot. As with the new experienced technology team, the productivity of the company will increase after the merger. Most of the costs after merger are relevant to the Yates, as it has not increased the costs much in total.