本文主要讲的是危险评估，评估危害包括考虑如果某人面临风险会发生什么，以及其事件发生的概率(Paton et al.， 2011)。进行危害评估可以帮助您评估可能包含在某个行动或任务中的潜在危险。危害评估可以帮助决定:危害有多严重;当前的控制措施是否有效;你应该采取什么措施来控制危害;采取措施的关键程度。风险评估时应该做的:有漏洞的风险如何可能导致伤害或疾病;工作运动包括各种不同的风险,和有一个缺乏理解如何危险可能相互合作创建原始或更严重的危险。本篇休斯顿论文代写文章由美国论文人EducationRen教育网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Evaluating hazard includes considering what could happen if somebody is presented to a risk and the probability of its event (Paton et al., 2011). Doing a hazard appraisal can help you assess the potential dangers that might be included in an action or undertaking.A hazard appraisal can help to decide: How serious a hazard is ；Whether any current control measures are effective ；What move you ought to make to control the hazard；How critically the move should be made. A hazard evaluation ought to be done when: There is vulnerability about how a risk may bring about damage or sickness ；The work movement includes various diverse risks, and there is an absence of comprehension about how the dangers may cooperate with each other to create original or more serious dangers.
Changes in the working environment happen that may effect on the adequacy of control measures (Reese, 2016).
It is compulsory under the model WHS Regulations to complete a hazard evaluation for high hazard exercises, for example, section into bound spaces, plunging work and live electrical work.
A hazard evaluation can be completed with differing degrees of detail contingent upon the sort of perils and the data, information, and assets you have accessible. It can be as basic as a dialog with your labourers or include particular hazard investigation apparatuses and methods suggested by security experts.
Once the dangers and their dangers are known, controls should be set up.
Under the model WHS Act, the best control measures include wiping out the hazard—that is expelling the hazard from the working environment. If that is impractical, one should limit dangers as it is sensibly practicable in nature.
While deciding the most appropriate controls, you must think through dissimilar choices and choose the control/s that most effectively disposes of the hazard or limits the threat in the situations (Smigorski, 2010). This can be an unsociable mechanism, or it could be a blend of several managements that collectedly provide the largest quantity of safety that is rationally realistic.