美国作业格式：普通法案例
案例研究表明，丹和雅各布点的是他们的婚礼蛋糕。Mikaela用来自塔面粉的杏仁粉做了他们的婚礼蛋糕，她相信在她和Ricky的谈话中，没有面筋的杏仁粉，这是塔面粉的代表。面粉不含麸质，而丹有结肠疾病，她对蛋糕有严重的反应。然后丹和雅各布想要苏·米凯拉做蛋糕，因为他们认为这是一个暗示，蛋糕必须是无谷蛋白的。有些顾客不要求无麸质蛋糕，因此Mikaela就会用不含谷蛋白的蛋糕做蛋糕。
美国作业格式：普通法案例
在这种情况下，Dan和Jacob并没有要求无谷蛋白蛋糕，他们只要求吃杏仁蛋糕。Mikaela打算为他们提供无麸质蛋糕，从塔面粉中使用杏仁面粉，据信这是在她与公司代表Ricky的谈话中免费提供的。由于婚礼蛋糕可能是无谷蛋白的，也有面筋，丹和雅各布没有要求无谷蛋白蛋糕。他们没有起诉米凯拉，因为在吃完蛋糕之后，丹的事情发生了。
美国作业格式：普通法案例
The case study shows that Dan and Jacob order Mikaela their wedding cake. Mikaela made their wedding cake using the almond flour from the Tower Flours, which she believed gluten free almond flour as per her conversation with Ricky, the representative of Tower Flours. The Flour was not gluten free and as Dan has the colic disease, she has a severe reaction to the cake. Then Dan and Jacob want sue Mikaela for the cake as they think it is the implied term that the cake must be of gluten free. Some customers do not ask for gluten free cake, and thus Mikaela uses to make cakes, which are not gluten free.
美国作业格式：普通法案例
In this case, Dan and Jacob did not request for gluten free cake and they only asked for almond cake. Mikaela intended to provide them gluten free cake used the almond flour from the Tower Flours, which is believed to be gluten free as per her conversation with the company representative Ricky. As the wedding cake may be of gluten free as well as with gluten, Dan and Jacob did not request for gluten free cake. They did not sue Mikaela for the cake for what happened to Dan after eating the cake.