美国论文代写：资本主义模式
许多经济学家和研究人员发现，很难把中国实行的经济模式联系起来。然而，一些特征和证据清楚地指向了威权资本主义经济模式。中国的政治制度和社会模式是这样的，政府干预是必要的。最重要的是，政府干预是由公司充分利用，作为回报，国家确保通过国有控股公司履行其议程。在自由市场民主的经济结构中，威权主义资本主义是不可能的。另一方面，中国共产党的权力不仅使国家对事物的控制得到了妥善的控制，而且使中国的国际形象在国际上出现了一个新的高度。
威权资本主义模式中的政府就是这样，它可以轻松地按照意愿推动对外关系和战略投资。目前，中国的投资主要集中在战略伙伴国家，如泰国（邻国），南非（作为金砖国家的一员）。这些投资对于未来的回报以及更好的外交政策杠杆都很重要。鼓励中国大陆公司（包括民营和上市公司）在战略目的地投资，政府控制的国有银行为这些努力提供必要的资金支持。因此，中国巨头很容易在某些市场定价欧美竞争对手。但是，在一个自由民主的公开市场上，政府和资本市场是不可能齐头并进的。例如，美国的奥巴马政府不能强迫美国公司投资东南亚战略市场，除非公司看到它的价值。
美国论文代写：资本主义模式
Many economists and researchers have found that it is difficult to relate a particular model of economy that has been practised by China. However, a number of characteristics and evidence clearly point towards authoritarian capitalism model of economy. The Chinese political system and social patterns are such that the government intervention is required in one way or the other. Most importantly, the government intervention is utilised to the fullest by the companies and in return the state makes sure to fulfil its agendas through the state controlled companies. Authoritarian capitalism is not possible in a free market democratic economic structure. On the other hand, the power of the Chinese Communist regime has not only given the state an uncompromised control over things, but also it has emerged the Chinese power image at the international level to a new height.
The government in the authoritarian capitalism model is such that it can push its foreign relations and strategic investments with ease and according to its will. Presently, the Chinese investments are focussed more on strategic partner countries such as Thailand (being the neighbouring nation), South Africa (as a member of the BRICS). These investments are important both in terms of future return and in having better foreign policy leverage. Major Chinese companies (both private and publicly listed) are encouraged to invest in the strategic destinations and the government controlled national banks provide necessary capital support for the endeavours. As a result, the Chinese giants are easily out pricing the European and American competitors in certain markets. However, in a free democratic open market it is not possible for the government and the capitalist market to go hand in hand. For example, the Obama government in the USA cannot force the American corporations to invest in its strategic Southeast Asian markets unless the companies see value in it.
