美国论文代写：工作协议
A). 琳恩很乐意与Kirk签订合同，完成甲板和园艺工作。Kirk除了材料费外，还要按小时收费。假设双方签订了一份合同以供考虑，琳恩有责任根据目前的劳动费率和材料向Kirk支付费用。如果琳恩在把订单交给安得烈叔叔之前撤销命令，她应该要求Kirk不要开始这项工作。因此，她没有显示通知Kirk关于撤销订单缺乏责任感，Kirk有权起诉琳恩和恢复挂起的700美元是由琳恩举起。
B）。安得烈主动提出做园艺工作，没有叫琳恩。在听取了安得烈的意愿后，琳恩同意给他这份工作，并承诺提供200美元的礼券。现在，这是给安得烈的一笔期票，不管工作的质量是不是他们口头交谈的一部分。他们没有法律约束自己的合同，但他们有口头协议，以一些考虑。然而，在这种情况下，安得烈不同意他为琳恩所做的工作的任何考虑，而200美元的礼券是琳恩的一个自愿承诺，他从未考虑过这项工作。因此，安得烈虽然有权得到琳恩许诺的200美元的礼券，但他无权要求她不支付礼券，因为这是琳恩自己提供的，不是安得烈要求的，也不是安得烈口头承诺或协议的一部分。安得烈没有资格获得200美元的礼券，因为它没有承诺和被她快乐的给予。
美国论文代写：工作协议
A). Lynne had willingly entered into a contract with Kirk to finish the deck and gardening work. Kirk was to charge her the going rate for labour on an hourly basis in addition to the material costs. Assuming that there was a contract that was signed by both for a consideration, Lynne had a responsibility to pay Kirk according to the current labour rate and materials. If Lynne was to revoke the order before giving it to her uncle Andrew, she should have asked Kirk to not start the work at all. Thus, as she did showed lack of responsibility in informing Kirk about the revoking of the order, Kirk has the right to sue Lynne and recover the pending $700 dollar that was held up by Lynne.
B). Andrew offered himself to do the gardening and was not called by Lynne. After hearing the willingness from Andrew, Lynne agreed to give him the job and also promised to offer a $200 gift voucher. Now, here is a promissory made to Andrew, irrespective of the quality of work done which was not part of their verbal conversation. They did not legally bind themselves by a contract, but they had a verbal agreement for some consideration. However, in this case, Andrew did not agree for any consideration for the work that he will do for Lynne, and the $200 gift voucher was a willing commitment from Lynne, without ever entering into a consideration for the work. So Andrew, though entitled to receive the $200 gift voucher as promised by Lynne, he is not entitled to take proceeding towards her for the non-payment of the gift voucher, as it was offered by Lynne herself and was not demanded by Andrew or a part of a verbal commitment or agreement by Andrew. Andrew is not entitled for the $200 gift voucher, as it was without commitment and being offered by her delightedness.
