美国essay代写:团队合作

08 4月 美国essay代写:团队合作

美国essay代写:团队合作

本报告的导言提供了对确保更高的失败几率的某些方面的深入了解。例如,在第一次模拟中缺乏对位置和交互问题的共识。然而,在完成这项任务的过程中,在这两项尝试中都突出了几个问题。首先,沟通是团队合作中最重要的方面,在两个模拟中都有一定的局限性。在虚拟团队中,由于没有面对面的交互,交流存在障碍,而在模拟中,当可以进行面对面的交互时,交流的问题得到了很大程度的减少。

据观察,在面对面互动的情况下,在决策过程中也花费了更多的时间。这种延迟可能有几个原因。这些原因已经讨论了他们对珠穆朗玛峰模拟的影响。此外,缺乏对现有信息进行分析的领导能力影响了目标的实现。考虑到所采用的领导风格和团队为完成一定程度的目标而相互作用的方式,这方面已经进行了讨论。最后,讨论了由于团队内部发生冲突而导致的决策问题。这里需要强调的是,冲突可能被认为是消极的方面,但是从给定的选项中评估和选择合适的选项很重要。

这些是研究中突出的一些主要问题。以上突出的问题将在考虑与领导相关的团队中进行讨论。报告的这一节详细讨论了所有这些方面。除此之外,还有一些相关方面影响了已经实现的目标。这些问题主要与上面强调的问题有关,并已得到讨论。

团队合作

对于一个团队来说,实现目标的第一件也是最重要的事情就是所有的成员都有动力去实现目标。该团队面临的第一个问题是缺乏环保人士。因为所有的团队成员都不可能到达顶峰,所以这个目标也不会实现。另一点需要注意的是,环保主义者的角色将不得不由团队中没有足够能力完成环保主义者任务的其他人来承担。

团队专注于沟通和互动,以便谨慎地做出决策。在某些情况下,很容易作出决定,但有时会出现意见冲突和有益的辩论。但如果不能达成共识,投票仍将进行。组长只为小事做决定。虽然每个人都同意优先考虑由队长作出的决定,但队员们对队长的决定没有多少信心,大多数时候是通过投票作出决定的。这说明领导对团队的影响很小。这造成了混乱,讨论缺乏方向。由于每个成员在做决定时都有平等的发言权,所以在做决定时浪费了很多时间。每个成员都花时间说服其他人相信他们的想法。决策的重点从选择可能的选项转移到使人信服。

美国essay代写:团队合作

The introduction to this report provided an insight into certain aspect that assures higher chances of failure. For example lack of consensus on location and issues in interaction in the first simulation. However, during the completion of the task, in both the attempts several issues have been highlighted. Firstly communication, which is the most important aspect in working with teams, has certain limitations in both simulations. In virtual teams, there were barriers to communication as there was no face-to-face interaction while in case of simulation when face-to-face interaction was possible the issues of communication were reduced to a greater extent.

It has been observed that more time was taken in decision making in case of face-to-face interaction also. There can be several reasons for such delay. These reasons have been discussed with respect to their impact on the Mount Everest simulation. Further, lack of leadership for analysis of information available has impacted the achievement of goals. This aspect has been discussed considering the leadership style that has been employed and the way team interacted to complete certain level of achievement of goal. Lastly, the issues in decision making due to conflict arising within the team have been discussed. It is important to highlight here that conflict may be considered as negative aspect but is important to evaluate and select appropriate option from the given options.

These are some of the major issues highlighted in the study. The issues highlighted above will be discussed considering working in a team that related to leadership. All these aspects have been discussed in detail in this section of the report. Apart from this there are certain related aspects that have influenced the goals that have been achieved. These are related primarily to the issues highlighted above and have been discussed.

Working in a Team

The first and foremost thing for a team to achieve the goal is that all the members are motivated to achieve the goal. The first issue that is there with the team is the absence of environmentalists. Since all the team members will not be able to reach the summit, the goal will not be achieved. Another point to note is that role of environmentalist will have to be taken up by someone else in the team who isn’t proficient enough to perform the task of environmentalist.

The team focused on communicating and interacting more so as to cautiously arrive at decisions. There are certain situations when the decisions were easily taken while at times there was clash of opinions and healthy debate took place. But still if the consensus is not reached vote was casted. The team leader took decisions only for trivial matters. Although everyone agreed that precedence will be given to the decision taken by the team leader, there was little confidence amongst the team members on the team leader decision and most of the times the decision was taken by voting. This shows that the leader had little influence on the team. This created confusion and discussion lacked directions. A lot of time was wasted in taking decisions as every member had equal say in the decision making. Each member spent time in convincing others on their idea. The focus of decision making shifted from selecting the possible options to convincing.