然而当使用它们成为至关重要的问题和设计。这里存在识别所需设计的管理能力的挑战,金融资源约束和更多。通常MCS评估结果在不同的方法,这是另一个设计水平的挑战。期望的结果可能会与实际结果的完成任务。这是一种评价方法。另一种方法是通过行为控制,人员管理。换句话说,公司的内部流程必须健壮。这些形式的评估需要控制的方式开发适合的原因。通过检查内部行为的外部结果根据一些专家将成为增强。然而每个任务的检查不会是可行的。总有预算限制为每个任务分配。一些任务进行只保留一个金融视角。人们努力实现有限资源的任务。在这种背景下可以设计权衡的主要挑战。什么因素应优先考虑和别人应该排除设计。Malmi et al(2005)(引用在哈马德,2010)认为,MCS是一个集成的系统。
However when to use them becomes a question of prime importance and design. Here there exist challenges of management capability of identifying the needed design, financial resource constraints and more. Usually the MCS evaluated results in different method and this is yet another design level challenge. The desired result could be compared to the actual result of the completed task. This is one type of evaluation method. Another method is by behavioral control, people management. In other words the internal process of the company must be robust. These forms of evaluation will require the controls to be developed in ways that suit the cause. By checking the internal actions the external results would be become enhanced according to some experts. However the checking of each task would not be feasible. There are always budgetary constraints for each task assigned. Some tasks are carried out keeping only a financial perspective. People strive to achieve the tasks with the limited resources available. In such a context the main challenges could be the design tradeoffs. What factors should take precedence and what others should be left out of design. Malmi et al (2005) (as cited in Hamad, 2010) argued that MCS is an integrated system.