费城论文代写-政府补贴是否是正当行为

20 9月 费城论文代写-政府补贴是否是正当行为

本文的主要讲述的是政府补贴是否是正当行为,提供补贴本身是歧视性的,类似于鼓励只保护其自身利益的行为的贿赂。世界贸易组织是促进自由贸易的权威和倡导者,它允许补贴的做法正在损害自己和其成员国,这在棉花种植中产生输家和赢家,尽管努力是相似的(Jishnu, 2015)。通过对人道主义幽灵的分析,世界贸易组织并不认为补贴是正当的,因为它使经济收益两极分化。得到补贴的实体在美国政府的支持下赚了更多的钱,而印度没有得到补贴的实体却未能赚到应有的钱,而这些钱被更廉价的进口商品削弱并蒙上了阴影。本篇费城论文代写文章由美国论文人EducationRen教育网整理,供大家参考阅读。

The provision of subsidy in itself is discriminatory, resembling a bribe for encouraging an act that is protective of its self-interests only. WTO which is an authority and advocate of promoting liberal trade is doing a disservice to itself and to its member states by allowing the practice of subsidy, which creates losers and winner in cotton farming, although the efforts are similar (Jishnu, 2015). The WTO, analysed through the spectre of humanitarianism, does not justify subsidies because it polarises economic gains. The subsidised entities make more money supported by the US government, and the unsubsidised entities in India fail to earn their rightful money, which is diminished and overshadowed by cheaper imports.
The prominence and continuation of discriminatory trade policies is to blame here, which concentrates benefits to one end in the US and exports risk and economic losses to Indian farmers. In addition, the rich farm lobbying groups in the US who are not paying any attention to their dastard impacts on the farmers in India are also to be blamed (Sam, 2016). Humanitarianism requires a business act to be considering the welfare of all those who are to receive an impact, and if the act is found to be creating disturbance in the achievement of its goals, it is to be abandoned. The US subsidies and WTO have failed the theory of humanitarianism completely and are not even repairing the situation and the damage they have inflicted on Indian cotton farmers.
The second theory through which the case is to be observed is Kantian ethics and his categorical imperative theory. As per the categorical imperative, an act that is capable of becoming a universal law instantly when it is enacted is the only act which must be accepted (Jost and Wuerth, 2011). The US subsidy and WTO rules have distorted trade balance and have destroyed all efforts of establishing and maintaining a universal market price (Brown, 2012). When subsidies continue for US cotton farmers, and give rise to difficult situation to Indian farmers, the act is not rational in its moral basis and must be discontinued. The act is not suitable to become a universal law, which is to regard all farmers of US and India to be similar and to be treated without the minutest discrimination (Piggott and Cook, 2006).

美国论文人EducationRen教育网具有一家专业的美国论文代写机构所要必备的条件。无论是原创性,创新性还是合理性对于一篇论文来说都是非常重要的。能够获得学生的首肯,成为最值得学生信赖的美国论文代写机构是我们美国论文人论文代写网始终以来的目标,我们也在不断地努力完善,创新,期望可以为留学生们提供最好的美国代写服务。