美国论文代写：关系冲突
两个人的关系不好，就不能在同一个小组里工作。因此，这可能导致在一个组内产生冲突。这种冲突称为关系冲突。在关系冲突，两人可能有一个坏的关系或负相关关系可能出现在同一个团队一起工作（卢、詹和龙婆，2009）。
群体关系冲突的影响
关系冲突利益的机会很少或微不足道。关系冲突可能在很多方面影响一个群体：
1、当关系冲突时，可能会导致团体内部的负面环境。
2、关系冲突可能导致团队内单个群体的产生，从而降低团队成员在同一群体中的团队精神。
3、当团队内部存在关系冲突时，这些成员开始喜欢组织中的其他组织。
4、群体的效率也随着关系的冲突而降低。
5、它也影响员工的个人表现。
任务冲突
任务冲突与团队执行的任务相关。这类冲突发生在两个人想要执行相同的任务或两个成员有不同的解决方案来执行那些任务时。第二个原因是，如果团队成员之间有相互理解，那么这可能会使团队受益。还有各种不同的情况，任务冲突可能发生。任务冲突可能是有益的和有害的，取决于球队的情况和小组成员的相互了解（西蒙斯&彼得森，2000）。
美国论文代写：关系冲突
When two persons do not have good relations with each other, then they may not work together within the same group. Thus, that may lead to generate a conflict within a group. This type of conflict is called relationship conflict. In relationship conflict, two persons may have a bad relationship or a negative relationship may arise by working together within the same team (Lu, Zhan & Laung, 2009).
Effect of relationship conflicts in group
The chances of having benefits of relationship conflict are very less or negligible. A relationship conflict may affect a group in many ways like:
1.When there is relationship conflict, then that may lead to a negative environment within a group.
2.Relationship conflict may lead to generation of groups within a single group which will reduce the spirit of team members in the same group.
3.When there is a relationship conflict within a group then those members start liking the other groups of the organization.
4.The efficiency of group also reduces with the relationship conflicts.
5.It also affects the individual performance of an employee.
Task Conflicts
Task conflicts are related to the task performed by the group. These types of conflicts occur when two people want to perform the same task or two members have different solutions for performing those tasks. In the second reason, if there is mutual understanding between the members of the team then that may lead to benefit the team. There are various other situations where the task conflict may occur. Task conflicts may be beneficial as well as harmful that depends on the situation of the team and the mutual understanding of the group members (Simons & Peterson, 2000).
