论文代写：符号互动
据研究，罗森堡认识到符号互动论，都是由个人在社会中扮演他们的角色。研究结果表明,没有精神状态可能发生有一个客观特征的存在。由于个人扮演他们的角色，并参与扮演角色，今后的角色，导致他们对他们的成功或他们的失败。这要求作者在本研究结果的形式是符号互动的过程，它可以给精神病心理学的学习是被处理的过程，然后提供一个目的和目标2主要贡献提供了各种治疗方案的有效性。
大多数社会心理学家，“自我”所涉及的符号互动理论下的反映，尽管个人的观点得到了个人的直接经验的结果制定的概念，是一切个人感知的自我是从别人对他们的感觉就像一个人。这个过程被称为一个个体通过他人的眼睛看自己或自己的反射性评价的过程。一个重要的角色是由Shrauger和舍尼曼1979起其中，研究，发现，而不是按照个人的概念什么其他人认为，个体的概念是和什么其他个人思考一个特定个体的相似的感知过滤。这是由Felson，1993解释，在研究计划由他总结，试图解释为什么人不能准确判断什么其他人认为它们是一个人。调查结果显示，有一个更好的想法在个人方面的其他人如何在小组可能会主张他们，而不是个人如何看到他们。重点是团体而不是个人。
论文代写：符号互动
According to study conducted by Rosenburg recognizing the symbolic interactionism lines that is taken up by individuals in the society for playing their roles in the society. The findings indicated that there is no psychotic state that can occur as there is an existence of objective trait. As individuals play their roles and participate in taking up roles, henceforth the roles lead them either towards their success or their failure. The claim of the author within this study in the form of results was that the process of symbolic interactionism has 2 main contributions that it can give to the insanity study in psychology which are to offer a purpose and aim to being treatment and secondly the process provides availability of various therapeutic procedures options.
For most social psychologists, the concept of “self” involved under the theory of symbolic interactionism reflects that even though the individual views gained are results of experience directly formulated by an individual, mostly everything that an individual perceives about the self is taken from what others feel about them as a person. This process is known as process of reflected appraisal according to which an individual looks at himself or herself through the eyes of others. An important role was played by the study of Shrauger and Schoeneman, 1979, wherein it was found that instead of individual conceptions in accordance to what other individuals perceive, the individual conception is filtered by the perception and resemblance of what other individuals think about a particular individual. This was explained by Felson, 1993, in which research program was summarized by him where attempts were made for explaining the reason why individuals cannot accurately judge what other individuals think about them as a person. The findings revealed that there is a better idea in individuals with regard to how other people in the group may advocate them rather than how individuals see them. The focus is on groups not individuals.
