论文代写:城市建筑

28 8月 论文代写:城市建筑

论文代写:城市建筑

本文从城市城市建筑的角度探讨了“生物政治”的概念。这个想法是追溯到通过初始福柯公式与城市主体之间的连接新的探索。我们发现通过对公共卫生的概念,论述物化的清洁,以及各种形态的城市秩序。我们发现,都市空间的生物政治动态包括法律和分散的影响,在现代文化中。它的结论是在城市建筑中的权力积极的形成应该衡量那些传播来源的权力,让城市生活的功能,尽管其不一致的特点。
此外,福柯,因为他自己都在一起,它试图解决这个问题,只是人们如何通过控制策略(福柯,2007)。这个挑战是围绕着两套关系,权力以及那些知识也在这个大纲,生物发电是人格化的调控方法,可以调整人的生活。我会建议,这个前景也是概念性的,并受到非常有用的解决方案的限制。
生物政治权力的上升焦点是集中在特定的个人和人口上,以确保当代主体的政策应该与民族国家的关键要求联系在一起。因此,一个复杂的相互作用在“政治体”以及军国主义的相关论述健康之间,民族主义和殖民主义,是体现在一个承上启下的行为实施最终在地缘政治控制的社会生物学的理由。仍不确定,如何获得政治权力的物质化确实开始统治身体以及因此进化进入司法和建立的体制结构状态(Oksala,2005)。

论文代写:城市建筑

This thesis explores the concept of ‘bio-politics’ in terms of urban city architecture. The idea is traced via its initial Foucauldian formula to latest explorations of the connection between the bodies with the city. We discover the concept via the materialization of discourses on public health, cleanliness, as well as various formations of city order. We locate that the bio-political dynamics of metropolitan space include both juridical as well as dispersed sources of influence in modern cultures. It is concluded that active formations of power in urban architecture should gauge those disseminate sources of power that allow the urban life to function despite its inconsistent characteristics.
Moreover, Foucault, as he himself all together put it, is attempting to tackle the issue of just how people are subjected through strategies of control (Foucault, 2007). This challenge is focused around two sets of relations: that of power as well as those of know-how and also in this outline, bio-power is personified in regulative methods by which human life could be tweaked. I will suggest that this prospect is also conceptual and restricted by very useful solutions.
The rising focus of bio-political power is as a result concentrated on specific individuals and populations, to make sure that the policy of the contemporary subject should be linked with the critical demands of the nation state. For that reason, a complex interaction in between the health of the ‘body politic’ as well as the related discourses of militarism, nationalism as well as colonialism which turns out to be reflected in a nexus of ethological implementation culminating in the socio-biological grounds of geo-political control. What remains uncertain that how political materializations of power first started to gain rule over the body as well as consequently evolve right into the juridical and the institutional structures of the established state (Oksala, 2005).

Tags: