代写论文:伦敦警察厅

13 6月 代写论文:伦敦警察厅

代写论文:伦敦警察厅

在这种情况下,利益相关者是伦敦大都会警察局、大众、平民德梅内塞斯,DSO,专员布莱尔和官员安迪赫尔曼。我们来了解的情况是,由警察和DSO在通信程序主要有错误。一个无辜的平民被击落,没有任何确凿的证据,作为一名自杀式炸弹袭击者,被认为与几天前的爆炸袭击事件有关。该案中的利益相关者,如伦敦警察局,都在寻找其他嫌疑人,他们在策划未来的袭击;任何可疑行为都会成为他们遭遇此类自杀式袭击者的一个证据。公众不知道这秘密计划正在进行的警察,因为已经恐慌的公众充满了恐惧的持续轰炸。即使梅内塞斯被警察枪杀,公众意识到了扭曲的真理,如何方便的警察没有把他们的伟大的沟通危机的事实,因为这将进一步破坏公共关系。德梅内塞斯,巴西电工,生活在自杀式袭击者奥斯曼生活在同一建筑物,和警方根据他的可疑行为和不遵守警察让他目标和警察杀害他在斯托克韦尔地铁站,在那里他被怀疑引爆炸弹。他甚至连照片被释放的四名嫌疑人中的一个都没有。警察没有任何确凿的证据和正当的法律程序,对他作出了不合理的决定。

代写论文:伦敦警察厅

The stakeholders in this case are the London Metropolitan Police, the general public, civilian Mr. De Menezes, the DSO, Commissioner Blair and official Andy Herman. What we come to know about the situation is that, there was a major error in the communication procedure by the police and the DSO. An innocent civilian was shot down without any definite proof, as a suicide bomber who was thought to be involved with the bombing attacks a few days ago. The stakeholders in this case like the London Metropolitan Police, were in search of other suspects who were in the planning of future attacks; any suspicious behavior would be a proof for them to encounter such suicide bombers. The general public was unaware of this secret planning going on by the police, as already panic stricken public were filled with fear by the on-going bombings. Even after De Menezes was shot by the police, the public was made aware of the twisted truth and how conveniently the police did not put out the actual truth of their great communication crisis, as it would further spoil the public relations. Mr De Menezes, a Brazilian electrician, lived in the same building where suicide bomber Osman lived, and according to the police his suspicious behavior and non-compliance with the police made him the target and the police killed him at the Stockwell tube station, where he was being suspected to set off a bomb. He was not even one of the four suspects whose photos were released earlier. The police took an irrational decision of shooting him without any definite proof and proper legal procedures.

Tags: